Triumph Exchange TEX


FTX's Collapse and Sam Bankman-Fried's Trial: Unravelling the Scandal

Table of Contents

In a turn of events, Sam Bankman-Fried, once hailed as the crypto industry’s golden boy, now stands as the number one public enemy in finance, and a defendant facing criminal charges. Just a year ago, the seemingly altruistic billionaire was celebrated for advocating for equality and donated generously to noble causes.

His trial is expected to last for 6 weeks, starting 3 October 2023. If convicted, he’ll be facing 110 years in prison (most experts expect him to serve them concurrently for 10-20 years).

The Scandal Unveiled

The scandal surrounding Sam Bankman-Fried, often referred to as SBF, began when he was accused of misappropriating funds from his cryptocurrency derivatives exchange company, FTX. Not only had he allegedly misused these funds, but he had also purportedly lied to his customers about how he utilised the funds. This revelation sent shockwaves through the cryptocurrency community, tarnishing the once-shining image of FTX, which was once compared to as the JP Morgan of Crypto.

So, What Really Happened to FTX?

FTX, a once-trusted platform for crypto trading, gained fame with its copious celebrity endorsements and its founder’s numerous visits to Capitol Hill. It raked in fees and earnings while it grew with the publicity it got. Its peak valuation soared to over $30 billion. However, the crypto market crashed from $3 trillion to $1 trillion in 2022 when it did.

Trouble hit FTX when CoinDesk raised questions about its financial ties to Alameda Research, another firm founded by SBF. Alameda Research relied heavily on FTT, an FTX-created token that was rapidly dipping in value. Alerted to the company’s mismanagement, customers rushed to withdraw their funds, revealing a $8 billion gap in funds.

SBF stepped down when FTX declared bankruptcy in November 2022. Legal issues piled up, leading to his arrest in the Bahamas in December. Then he was extradited to the U.S. where he faced fraud and conspiracy charges.

SBF’s Arrest

Days after SBF’s extradition to the U.S., his inner circle pleaded guilty to their criminal charges and began cooperating with prosecutors. However, SBF pleaded not guilty to the charges against himself.

Even under bail, he continued talking in interviews and leaked crucial evidence and information regarding his case which eventually landed him in even more trouble.

The court later revised his bail conditions to restrict him to a flip phone and a basic laptop, further cutting down on his communication. That didn’t stop him from leaking Allison’s (his co-founder and ex-girlfriend) diary to the New York Times.

The judge then agreed to revoke his bail and sent him to a Brooklyn jail until his trial commenced.

Key Figures in the Trial

This trial is as dramatic as it’s historical. SBF’s co-conspirators, now cooperating with authorities with their words carrying heavy weight in the case. The jury selection and the witness testimonies will also be closely watched.

SBF himself

31-year-old MIT alumni and star of the show. He was the co-founder and CEO of the now failed FTX and a co-founder hedge fund trading company, Alameda Research. Once hailed as one of the youngest billionaires in the world, he’s always eager to give interviews, even after FTX’s implosion and his arrest. SBF pleaded not guilty to all counts against him.

The inner circle who were in the room when it happened:
Caroline Ellison

Former Wall Street Trader and Alameda Research’s CEO alongside with her than romantic partner, SBF. She pleaded guilty to 7 criminal charges and is expected to testify against SBF in his trial. Her testimony against SBF should be pretty interesting.

Nishad Singh

FTX’s former head of engineering. Singh, SBF and Gary Wang allegedly had total control of the code that controlled funds at FTX. Singh had already pleaded guilty to six counts, including conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering. He is also expected to testify against SBF in the trial.

Gary Wang

Co-founder of FTX and Alameda Research. He served as the Chief Technology Officer for both companies. Gary had been friends with SBF since high school and was on FTX foundation (FTX’s charity division) together with Ellison and Singh. He has pleaded guilty to four criminal charges.

SBF’s parents

His parents are Stanford law professors who were the early advisors for FTX. They lived on campus at Stanford University where they lectured. They are both currently sued by FTX for allegedly using their influence to snag millions in FTX customer funds for their own personal gain.

Joseph Bankman

SBF’s father. He provided financial advice to FTX in its early days. As the company eventually grew, he deemed $200,000 FTX salary unfitting. SBF then purportedly wired $10million cash gift to his parents.

Barbara Fried

SBF’s mother. She never had a formal position in the company, but was an influential advisor for FTX’s decisions. She was one of the key figures in FTX’s political contributions.

Judge Lewis Kaplan

The man overseeing the trial. If the jury finds SBF guilty, he’ll be the one dishing out the years SBF’ll spend behind bars. He presided over the first-ever federal bitcoin securities fraud trial and has overseen multiple big-name lawsuits, including former US president, Donald Trump.

Key points of The Trial

SBF’s trial is not just a personal reckoning to himself or this specific crypto but a significant event for the entire cryptocurrency industry.

This trial is set to be a jury trial with members of the jury playing a part in deciding if SBF is guilty of his charges.

The seven main charges against SBF:

1. Two counts of wire fraud (aka misappropriating customers’ deposits)
2. Four counts of conspiracy to commit fraud (aka planning to deceive with partners)
3. One count of conspiracy to commit money laundering (aka attempting to hide fund sources)

Evidence against SBF

The U.S. government is preparing to present a staggering 1,300 pieces of evidence, including financial records, text messages, and an audio recording from an internal meeting where allegations suggest that SBF authorised the funnelling of FTX customer funds into Alameda Research. Notably, his previous co-conspirators are now all testifying against him in this trial.

Involvement of Advisors

Adding complexity to the case, SBF’s parents, Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried, who were early advisors for FTX, are also dragged into the trial. Their influence on the company and their involvement in political contributions has raised questions and led to controversy.

Probable Defence Strategy

SBF’s defence strategy is expected to pivot on portraying him as a young and inexperienced entrepreneur who acted on ill-guided legal advice. Whether SBF himself will testify in his defence remains uncertain and will be influenced by his lawyers’ counsel and overall strategy.

With the amount of evidence against him and the amounts of speeches and information he had posted himself, SBF cannot really defend himself in on the count if he actually committed the crimes.

Instead, legal experts and speculators are saying that he would appeal on the “lack of intent”. He would most probably defend that never intended for the funds to be misused and that he did not commit fraud intentionally. His appeal would be that he acted on ill advice and was negligence and mismanaged affairs, all just short of fraud.

The Outcome and Its Impact on Crypto

The outcome of SBF’s trial is poised to have far-reaching consequences for the cryptocurrency industry:


FTX’s downfall and SBF’s trial have eroded public trust in cryptocurrencies. This led to calls for stricter regulations within the crypto community to rebuild trust and reputation.

Stringent Regulations

Governments worldwide are introducing stricter regulations and enhanced background checks on crypto-related finance companies and entities. This leads to intensified scrutiny on exchange platforms globally.

Crypto vs. Finance Fraud

The trial could blur the lines between crypto-specific issues and broader finance fraud. The defence may attempt to frame SBF’s trial as a crypto case, while the government may argue otherwise.

Crypto Exchange Crackdown

FTX’s downfall has triggered a heightened crackdown on crypto exchanges, with regulators aiming to eliminate fraud and bolster market integrity. As we have seen with the SEC out for Binance, CoinBase and Ripple.

In conclusion, SBF’s trial and the collapse of FTX have cast a shadow over the cryptocurrency industry. If SBF is found guilty of fraud, we could very well be looking at one of the biggest financial frauds in U.S. history. As we await the verdict, it remains to be seen how this trial will impact crypto holders, regulations, and exchange platforms. This might set a precedent which will influence the direction of the entire cryptocurrency landscape in the future.

Share Article